The Foreign Donor Bogeyman
Presumably because NMP Siew Kum Hong was vocal about gay rights and AWARE's stress on gender rather than women's rights per se, his political adversaries shrewdly capitalised on allegations that he and Maruah accepted foreign handouts from a Swede gentleman, Johan Skarendal. Allegations to which Siew Kum Hong angrily denied and strongly objected to. His adversaries were clever enough to open that front to ignite the government's relatively justifiable paranoia, and the police report made by the NMP indicated that he knew enough of the seriousness of the allegations. The Yahoo lawyer categorically denied that he was involved in any inappropriate or illegal funding from the Swede, and by inference as Maruah members were there as well, Maruah was also not implicated in dubious funding, closing the case.
The government's fear of foreign funding of local politicians and activists is not unique. The UK has the Political Parties, Elections and Referendum Act forcing all parties to be transparent about their donations and outlawed foreign funding. The reasons were to prevent corruption and mitigate public cynicism related to the integrity of political parties and donor influence over politicians. However, other countries are even wary of their NGOs accepting foreign donations. Turkey and Russia are such examples. To be fair and understanding the realist realities of the world, the anxiety over the hidden agenda of foreign donations to political parties and NGOs are not unfounded.
Some foreign public and private philanthropies are designed as catalysts of political change in supposedly less democratic states. The objective of funding is to spur on "democracy" and the US' National Endowment for Democracy, which Dr Chee Soon Juan was a fellow in 2004, is a common example of missionary democracy and the need to convert "ignorant heathens" for their own good. However, at the other extreme, sounding the nationalistic klaxon, less progressive governments typically raise the ghoul of foreign intervention as an excuse to choke and isolate local politicians and activists within their borders. Perhaps the tentative balance is that politicians cannot accept any kind of foreign funding while activists can accept foreign funding as long as it is not directly or indirectly engineered by a foreign government. Perhaps.
Regardless if the recent Swede's visit was an innocuous one or not, it paved the way for further questions on what foreign donations political parties and activists can accept without detonating ethical and legal powder kegs. Who else besides Siew Kum Hong and some Maruah activists did Johan Skarendal meet as part of his Singapore itinerary is not public information. Arguably in the interest of the development of a civil society without a paranoid government taking every chance to jump at shadows and curb the honest work of activists, hopefully other parties that met the Swede are not naive and also followed Maruah's example of financial integrity and independence.
http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.457
萧锦鸿在AWARE纷争上，站在旧执委这一边。
官委议员萧锦鸿网上被攻击，被指积极推广同性恋，没资格寻求连任！
萧锦鸿律师日前表示将寻求连任官委议员一职，不过网络上最近却出现了不少网友，炮轰他没资格！
许多网络论坛，包括在民情联系组（REACH）的讨论话题，都有大批网民批判他参与最近AWARE的纷争。
网民甚至也在他的部落格上继续讨伐他。
萧锦鸿在AWARE纷争上，站在旧执委这一边。
他积极为她们站台，并在5月2日的特别会员大会上与她们同坐。新执委当时要求他与其他男性会员同座，但他却不肯，引起一阵骚动。
最后，旧执委辨称他是她们的法律顾问，他才得以留下。
不过，他后来又被指超越界限，不仅为旧执委说话，还安排支持者欢呼和吹嘘。