Thursday, May 14, 2009

What a more appropriate CSE could look like (Part II)

Today’s (13 May 2009) Straits Times carried a forum letter, "Instilling Values a Complex Task", in which the writer states :

The social and cultural environment in which young people are informally educated consists of more than parents and teachers. In today’s information society, a child’s identity develops under influences that far exceed the censorship of well-meaning adults.

Television, cinema, popular music and the Internet, for example, are powerful and pervasive transmitters of popular culture and cosmopolitan values.

Such media images of gender roles and sexual behaviour draw on a range of liberal and conservative perspectives.

To what extent does the formal curriculum in schools teach students to critically analyse these diverse media messages so as to help them make responsible, well- informed decisions for themselves?

Censoring all alternative views would be contrary to the Ministry of Education’s (MOE) push for critical thinking. If argumentative essays at the secondary and junior college levels can encourage students to engage both sides of the ‘pro-life’ and ‘pro-choice’ abortion debate, why should not this balanced approach be similarly extended to the controversial topics of gender roles and sexual orientation?

A mature curriculum for sexuality education should reflect not only the mainstream views and values of Singapore’s society but also an educated awareness of alternative views based on well- researched knowledge and information.

Let’s pick up on two issues raised in this letter — the pervasive influence of the media and the need for a sensitive and intelligent sexuality education program to deal with this — in the light of the current AWARE Comprehensive Sexuality Education Program, which instructor’s guide states that :

(1) Pre-marital sex is neutral

(2) Anal sex is neutral

(3) Virginity is a state of mind

(4) Sex is fun

Suppose a student watches a movie (say "Rear Entry") in which there is an explicit sex scene between a teenaged couple (unmarried of course), and for some reason it has escaped the notice of our usually diligent censors that there is a very graphic depiction of anal sex. In the extreme, what might the instructor say in relation to this movie which is consistent with the CSE guide ?

Society and your parents probably don’t generally approve of pre-marital sex, but in reality there may be times when you just feel like doing it with your boyfriend. Lots of teenagers do it. Let me tell you that there is nothing to be ashamed of. Sex is fun and normal, and all forms of sexual activity (including anal sex) are ok. Just make sure you don’t get hurt and that your boyfriend is wearing a condom correctly.

Society and your parents probably think that virginity is important, so you should wait till you get married. Actually its all a state of mind. Some people think that anal sex or oral sex are not sex and therefore you are still a virgin as long as you don’t engage in virginal sex — that’s what you believe, and you are a virgin if that’s what you believe. Some people believe that you are a virgin if you abstain from sex for long periods between each encounter — what you believe, and you are a virgin if that’s what you believe.

Or would this be more appropriate ?

Society and your parents probably don’t generally approve of pre-marital sex, but in reality there may be times when you just feel like doing it with your boyfriend. Lots of teenagers do it. Let me tell you that sexual desire is nothing to be ashamed of. Sexual desire is normal, but I want you to be very clear that there are risks in engaging in (casual / pre-marital) sex, and it is partly for these reasons that your parents wouldn’t want you to engage in pre-marital sex. The risks are :

1. You might get pregnant.

2. You might contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), particularly when engaging in a riskier form of sexual activity such as anal sex.

3. Condoms when used correctly can significantly reduce the risk of (1) and (2). However, sometimes condoms are used incorrectly (especially in the heat of passion) or they fail (burst). If a condom does not completely cover a lesion, you might still contract genital warts.

4. You might feel hurt emotionally or "used" if the relationship does not work out. Or your privacy might be compromised — look at Edison Chen, et al !

If you do decide to go ahead and have sex, my advice is that you should at least insist that your boyfriend is wearing a condom. Maybe you even want to ask him if he has an STD or multiple sex partners before — that would be an indication (though by no means conclusive) of whether he is "safe" ! And if ever you engage in an unsafe sexual activity, please go and get yourself tested. Early detection and treatment will better protect your health, and is the only responsible thing to do for your future sex partner(s).

If you find all the above a little intimidating, then maybe casual / pre-marital sex is not worth the risk ! While a lot of teenagers do engage in sex, and you might feel pressure to do the same, there are also be teenagers who have consciously decided not to engage in sex until they are married. Maybe this seems a little old-fashioned — sex is portrayed so attractively and as so commonplace in the media. But movies do not create reality, you do. You have a choice as to whether to give in to pressure. You have a choice as to whether to avoid places and situations where you might be tempted to have sex with your boyfriend. And I hope that, when under pressure, you would have the courage and presence of mind to do what is safe even if it seems unpopular — abstaining from sex.

Admittedly the above is easier to pen than to say to a teenager. Well, my time will come when my kids become teenagers.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28486.118

What a more appropriate CSE could look like

What a more appropriate CSE could look like

In 1998, former US President Bill Clinton made the infamous claim that oral sex is not sex. More recently, the AWARE instructor’s guide to its Comprehensive Sexuality Eduction (CSE) Program makes the mind-boggling suggestion that, maybe, "virginity is a state of mind".

There are many things I find disturbing about the instructor’s guide to the CSE Program. Excuses such as only 1.5 minutes being spent on the topic of homosexuality or the instructors’ guide not being indicative of the message imparted during an actual CSE program do not hold water in my opinion. My retort to those excuses are :

(1) What exactly was said about homosexuality during the 1.5 minutes ? I’m inclined to agree with the old AWARE’s supporters that a 1.5 minute discussion on homosexuality (no matter how inappropriate) probably isn’t going to turn a girl into a lesbian. But is a simple discussion revolving around the statement that "homosexuality is neutral" sufficient to convey complexities such as that not everyone who engages / experiments with homosexual sex is necessarily a homosexual, and that at least for those who are merely "experimenting", homosexuality is not "just the way you are" (another statement from the material) ?

(2) Even if instructors do not repeat every word in their guide to students, surely the answers provided in the guide (including the inappropriate answers) will be used as and when a student pops a question which the guide provides an answer to ?

Some of my other concerns are :

(1) Classifying "anal sex" as healthy or neutral, when this form of sexual activity (where it involves penetration of the anus with a penis) often (as far as I’m aware, can’t speak from personal experience here sorry) involves more pain and carries a higher risk of transmission of sexual disease.

(2) Classifying pre-marital sex as neutral.

(3) Classifying virginity as a state of mind (whatever that means).

(4) Categorically denying that the possibility that childhood trauma may cause homosexuality, when no one knows for certain the cause(s) of homosexuality.

I am therefore somewhat gratified to hear, on my return to Singapore, the Ministry of Education saying that the CSE program was inappropriate because it "convey[ed] messages which could promote homosexuality or suggest approval of pre-marital sex". I am also gratified to observe Internet forumers in general agreement that there was something inappropriate about the CSE program, though this has not stopped the occasional odd opinion that there was nothing wrong and everything right about the CSE program : see here and here.

I think a more appropriate CSE could, on the topic of sex, say :

(1) That sex is essentially a risky activity (I am such a pessimist). That there will always be a risk of unwanted / unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), even if condoms are used.

(2) That when a couple engages in sex within the boundaries of marriage there is greater (albeit sometimes misplaced) assurance that the husband would support the wife in the case of an unplanned pregnancy, and that the husband / wife have not been unfaithful and are therefore free of STIs. Even then, pregnant mothers are encouraged to test for HIV in case they had been infected by their husbands, to prevent the onward tranmission of HIV to their babies. Hence pre-marital sex is higher risk activity, compared to sex between married couples.

(3) That certain forms of sexual activity, such as anal sex, are particularly risky, because of the higher risk of STI transmission.

(4) That responsible sex in a pre-marital (and even marriage) context means (i) ensuring that you are free of STIs before engaging in sex (or that you inform your partner you have been sleeping around and I-might-have-caught-an-STI-from-I-don’t-know-who-but-nevermind-will-you-still-have-sex-with-me-please ?), (ii) using a condom, and (iii) being prepared to deal with the potentially lifelong consequences should something go wrong, ie. STI infection or unplanned pregnancy.

(5) That for the above practical reasons, sex should ideally be confined to married couples, and virginity is rightfully valued.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28486.113

Liu Guo Dong: “Let the law resolve the issue if talks fail”

Liu Guo Dong: “Let the law resolve the issue if talks fail”

Liu Guodong told reporters at his hotel this morning that he is still waiting for STTA to contact him and he does not want to talk much now.

He said the purpose of his trip was to obtain a clarification from Lee Bee Wah and he wants to meet her and nobody else. He will consider taking legal action against her if talks fail.

Liu claimed that he had no intention to create trouble for STTA as he has his own matters to attend to such as meeting the President of the Indonesia Table-Tennis association.

He demands STTA to clarify its statements about him in the press and is now waiting for them to give him a call. “They should take the initiative to contact me,” he said.

Liu Guodong said: “I was a staff of STTA in the past, but not now. I will not go and stand outside the association like a fool.”

STTA has expressed willingness to meet up with Liu if he is free tonight.

A STTA spokesperson told the media that they did not manage to contact Liu yet and they will meet him tomorrow if he is not available tonight. Lee Bee Wah will probably be present during the meeting.

Liu Guodong is confident that 80% of public opinion is on his side. He was elated reading about the level of support he had received from the public in the papers.

He revealed that he still harbored sentiments for Singapore: “The last 4 years in Singapore were my most successful 4 years. I do not clamor for fame. The previous STTA President asked me to train the women team which I readily accepted. I am still willing to return to the team in the future even if I am not paid a single cent.”

Lee Bee Wah remained uncontactable for the entire day. Both the journalists and Liu had tried calling her to no avail.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28588.17

NHG's employee thinks that STTA Hon Sec should be removed as well for his lame defence of Lee Bee Wah

STTA Hon Sec should be removed as well for his lame defence of Lee Bee Wah

Our online petition calling for removal of Lee Bee Wah as STTA president which was published by Channel News Asia has put renewed pressure on the beleaguered PAP MP for her latest faux paus plunging her association into another controversy yet again.

In spite of widespread public disaffection and fury over her shabby treatment of ex-coach Liu Guodong, who won Singapore’s first Olympic medal in 48 years, STTA is adamant that her decision was correct.

STTA Honorary Secretary Soon Min Sin said it is standing firm, both in its decision not to nominate Liu for the award as well as support of Ms Lee as president.

One key factor, though not the only one, that led to Ms Lee being elected as president last July was her passion for the sport, said Mr Soon.

She showed that she cared, and had some understanding of the sport as an ex-captain of the Nanyang Technological University team - that was what won over the majority of the “30 to 40″ representatives at the Annual General Meeting that day, according to Mr Soon.

And nine months later, she has the results to show for it.

“I think she has gelled the national team together. The players, the coaches are now a lot more cohesive than before. Even when players fall sick, she goes to the hospital to visit them. These are all behind the scenes.”

For his INCOHERENT, IRRATIONAL and NAIVE comments, Soon Min Sin must be removed together with Lee Bee Wah from STTA before more damage is done to the sports.

Soon Min Sin has more than adequately demonstrated his gross ignorance of competitive sports - that coaches and the other axillary staff are responsible for delivering results and nothing else.

Liu Guodong won a Olympic silver medal for Singapore. How many Singapore coaches, including the last winner of the Coach of the year had achieved his feat? For that alone, he deserved the award never mind his other alleged short-comings such as neglecting the male team.

Had Liu spent more time on the male team and end up winning nothing, will he be given the award based on him spending equitable amount of time and resources to develop both team?

What “results” had Lee Bee Wah got to show since she “gelled” the national team together as according to Soon? Did the table-tennis team win any medal in major tournaments during this period of time? The answer is NO!

To put it bluntly, any Tom, Dick or Harry can put up a good “wayang” to show his/her “understanding” and “passion” for table tennis and to show tender loving care to the players, but very few are able train a team to win a medal in an international tournament.

If Soon Min Sin was an ardent fan of the English Premier League, he would have known that coaches (managers) are judged solely by their results and not by the “compassion” they shown to the players.

Alex Ferguson of Manchester United is undoubtably the best manager who has graced the English Premier League. By Soon’s “standards”, he would not qualified to win even the “manager of the month” award because he once kicked a boot right into the face of David Beckham.

Soon Min Sin still has the cheek to say:

“If the public wants to start a petition, they’ve every right to do so. But what’s important is to ask ourselves ‘what is the role of STTA and are we doing our job?’

Not only do we have the right to start a petition to remove you and your President, we have every right to question the wisdom of STTA in allowing Lee Bee Wah who has created so much trouble in her short stint to remain as President of the association.

Singapore Table Tennis Association (STTA) is a National Sports Association affiliated to the Singapore National Olympic Council (SNOC) and Singapore Sports Council (SSC).

Who pays for the operating expenses of STTA? And who pays for the salaries of its administrative and playing staff? Every single cent comes from the public! Why should we leave the running of STTA entirely to Soon Min Sin and his gang?

Lee Bee Wah, Soon Min Sin and the entire committee can be replaced with a new team and STTA will still not collapse. They are easily replaceable. However, a world-class coach with a proven track record is definitely not easily replaceable.

Let’s see if the table-tennis team will be able to repeat their achievements in the next Olympic game. We will expect them to win a gold medal this time.

Will Lee Bee Wah, for all her efforts to “gel” the team together help it win a medal again? Or will she castigate the coach in public for not following her orders?

The truth is: Liu Guodong stepped on her toes by refusing to obey her wishes to show her any “face”. After all, she is a PAP MP who nobody dares to offend. Now Liu is gone, no honor shall be given to him to leave him a legacy.

While Liu has his character smeared in public in spite of winning a medal, somebody who lost billions of dollars of taxpayers’ monies was given a May Day award.

That’s how meritocracy worked in Singapore. No matter how good you are, you still need to have connections with the elite to leave your mark behind.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28839.9

Online petition started by NHG's employee to remove Lee Bee Wah garners more than 1,000 signatories and still counting

Online petition to remove Lee Bee Wah garners more than 1,000 signatories and still counting

After the extensive publicity given to our online petition by both the English and Chinese dailies, the number of Singaporeans penning their names down on the petition to remove Lee Bee Wah as STTA President has now exceeded a thousand.

Many Singaporeans are simply outraged at her gross callousness in casting aspersions on the integrity and professionalism of one of Singapore’s most successful coach in recent times, having won a coveted Olympic medal for Singapore after 48 years of barren spell.

Lee Bee Wah still remained uncontactable since the furore erupted. Is this another misquote by the journalists? Her continued silence on the fracas is an admission of guilt on her part in slandaring coach Liu and bringing the entire STTA into disrepute.

If coach Liu indeed has some “problems” in his character, then Lee Bee Wah should substantiate her allegations in public now that her initial statements were widely reported by the press.

Why did STTA offer Liu a new, improved contract then if they found him to be undeserving in the first place?

Coach Liu had been with STTA for 4 years and he never experienced any problems with the previous President. Neither were there negative reports about him in the media. Why did he suddenly become “problematic” with the arrival of Lee Bee Wah? Does the real problem lies with Liu or Lee?

Though Liu Guodong has left Singapore for more than half a year, many Singaporeans still appreciate his contributions to the nation.

Wrote Low Kok Kiong:
Low Kok Kiong It is a wrong move and you have put Singapore in a bad light internatioanally. You were given this opportunity to close the whole chapter regarding LGD yet you did not make use of this golden opportunity. I am disappointed with your decisions not to nominate LGD and to say things about professionalism and conduct is really uncalled for. It just shows how petty the STTA or Singapore is and I wonder how it can attract more foreign talent coaches in Singapore again.

Another netizen was disgusted with her actions:
raj I’m disgusted with STTA president Ms Lee Bee Wah for her actions against the coach. I feel he deserves more than just a medal or the title ‘coach of the year’ ….his name should go into the books of Singapore records for working with the team to achieve a Silver medal for Singapore….Comon’ we’re talking Olympics here and not some RC game. Ms Lee should STEP DOWN and apologise for her mistakes and remarks. Singapore…lets be gracious & reward the coach.

Doris was concerned if Singapore is still able to attract top foreign talents in the future with this kind of “culture” Lee Bee Wah brought into STTA:
Doris Just like in a company, if one made a mistake and will be “mark” and ask to leave, who will dare to work hard for this company? Who on earth will not make mistake?Moreover Coach Liu had made up any mistakes(if he really had mistakes) by winning the sliver olympic medal. Why so narrow minded? How can Singapore attract good players or coach to join Singapore team if this kind of culture still stay in STTA? So I am not surprise we won’t score any olympid medal again if STTA lead by Miss LBW

The degree of anger and indignation felt by Singaporeans is a testimony of Lee Bee Wah’s unpopularity:
Wu MengJun Liu brought glory to the nation and right after that you had to sack him because of some personal issues. Singaporeans don’t want him sacked. the players dont want him sacked. JUST BECAUSE OF YOU LEE BEE WAH U BROUGHT SHAME AND ANGER RIPING THROUGH THE NATION. SHAME ON YOU! save yourself some face and step down on your own because you don’t deserve to be a STTA President. You don’t have the integrity nor the chacracter for it. You don’t qualify for it at all.

We will send an ultimatum to Lee Bee Wah together with the petition to implore her to step down as STTA President for the sake of the association, sports and nation.

If she still wilfully refuse to do so, we will escalate the matter up to the higher authorities.

For those of you who still have not signed the petition, please do so here:

http://www.petitiononline.com/lbh/petition.html

Please forward it to everybody you know and let’s aim to hit 5,000 by the end of the week.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28839.11

3 NMP hopefuls draw flak

May 14, 2009
3 NMP hopefuls draw flak
By Derrick Ho
(From left) Mr Siew Kum Hong, Ms Loretta Chen and Ms Beatrice Chia-Richmond, have come under heavy criticism from netizens for being 'homosexuality' activists. -- ST FILE PHOTOS
THREE Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) hopefuls, Mr Siew Kum Hong, Ms Loretta Chen and Ms Beatrice Chia-Richmond, have come under heavy criticism from netizens for being 'homosexuality' activists.

Mr Siew - who is seeking a second term as an NMP - has been bearing the brunt of the flak and was flamed on several popular forums, including a discussion thread on the government's Reach website, over his recent involvement in the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) leadership tussle.

Several postings accuse him of 'promoting homosexual lifestyle' and creating 'outrage among the majority of Singaporean', especially among parents.

One netizen wrote: 'I strongly feel that Siew Kum Hong is not suitable to be an NMP at all. His recent behaviour is really questionable. Why is he pushing so hard for the GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexuals and Transgender)? There are so many more pressing issues during this recession and yet he devoted so much of his time to the Aware saga.'

Another wrote: 'Does his views reflect the views of Parliament? He is dragging the whole reputation of the Singapore Govt and Parliament down with his actions. Stop wasting our time in Parliament and polarising Singapore society.'

But a small group is defending him. Said one of them: 'The more comments I read here, the more I realise that Siew Kum Hong has stood up for the advancement of very basic social and human rights issues that far too often goes unspoken or ignored by other representatives in the country.'

First opened for comments on May 1, the thread has gathered over 114 comments, with over 1,800 page views on Thursday morning.

Reach is a government-run website which encourages Singaporeans to contribute feedback and ideas on issues that concern them.

Known for his controversial views on several issues, including the repeal of of Section 377A which criminalises sex between consenting males, Mr Siew, 34, has supported the Aware's old guard who were ousted from office. He then actively campaigned for them and acted as their legal advisor during the Extraordinary General Meeting (EOGM) on May 2, which booted out the new executive committee and brought back the old guard.

Socio-political website Wayang Party said on its site that it has received notice that a campaign is underway to 'swarm' Reach with feedback to exert pressure on the Parliamentary Select Committee to reject Mr Siew's application.

The committee, led by Parliament Speaker Abdullah Tarmugi, will make its recommendations on NMPs to the President after the interview process.

Ms Chen, a theatre director, has been accused of being 'no different' in advocating a gay agenda.

'She's openly gay and has also directed films with mainly controversial themes. She's supposed to be a nominee from the arts community but is this again a back door for more pro LGBTs to represent voice in Parliament for education?' wrote a netizen on Reach.

Another critic says of Ms Chia-Richmond: 'She has directed and acted in many movies and mostly, if not all, are extremely provocative, dark and controversial, and many based on theme on homosexuality...'

Mr Siew has also been flamed on his personal blog for his so-called 'gay agenda', which prompted netizen to complain to the Prime Minister's Office.

This letter, which is posted by Mr Siew's blog site, says: 'We want to complain to the govt that an NMP Siew Kum Hong was not only openly taking sides in this internal affair of a secular organisation, but was part of the orchestrated disorder and mayhem on that day. He showed no regard for protocols until challenged by a member from the floor.'

Mr Siew remains unfazed by the torrent of criticisms. He told The New Paper (TNP) on Thursday that 'at no point did I seek to leverage on the fact that I am an NMP'.

'I am anti-discriminatory.... these people are ignoring the existence of the middle ground,' TNP quoted him as saying.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.362

DPM ON AWARE SAGA: Q&A with DPM on Aware saga

May 14, 2009
DPM ON AWARE SAGA
Q&A with DPM on Aware saga
Mr Wong Kan Seng (left), Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister, replies on the recent incident involving women's advocacy group Aware. --PHOTO: ST

MR WONG Kan Seng, Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister, replied on Thursday to queries from The Straits Times on the recent incident involving women's advocacy group Aware. This is the full text of his replies.

Homosexuality

Homosexuality is the issue behind the issue of the leadership takeover at Aware. The new exco members, mentored by veteran lawyer and lay church leader Thio Su Mien, justified their actions by arguing that Aware had veered towards the promotion of a gay and lesbian agenda in recent years. They argued that, like in the United States, there is now in Singapore a 'political homosexual agenda' that aims to push not only for decriminalisation of homosexuality, but also for same sex marriage. This last, they argued, would destroy the meaning of the family, and ultimately Singapore's social fabric.

What is the Government's stand on homosexuality? Has it changed? What is the Government's assessment of where the majority of Singaporeans stand on this? What grounds does the Government have for this assessment?

The Government's position on this issue is clear. It was stated by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in Parliament on October 2007, and it has not changed. In his speech, PM Lee said that Singapore is basically a conservative society and the conventional family, a heterosexual stable family, is the norm and the building block of our society. However, we recognise that homosexuals are part of our society.

They have a place in our society and are entitled to their private lives. This is the way the majority of Singaporeans want it to be - a stable society with traditional, heterosexual family values but with space for homosexuals to live their private lives and contribute to society.

The Government was not going to be pressured into changing its position on homosexuality before the takeover of Aware. Nor does the Government intend to change its position now that the old guard has recaptured Aware.

Pushing boundaries

What is the Government's stand on homosexuals trying to push their cause publicly? What are the dos and don'ts for them?

The debate on Sec 377A of the Penal Code showed how the homosexuality issue polarised our society. Advocates on both sides were passionate and vocal. In the recent Aware tussle, homosexuality was clearly a major issue to both sides. This is unproductive and divisive.

Our society will not reach consensus on this issue for a very long time to come. The way for homosexuals to have space in our society is to accept the informal limits which reflect the point of balance that our society can accept, and not to assert themselves stridently as gay groups do in the West.

We live in a diverse, multiracial and multi-religious society. Every group, whether religious or secular, has to live and let live, to exercise restraint and show mutual respect and tolerance. If any group pushes its agenda aggressively, there will be strong reactions from the other groups.

Government intervention, OB markers and NCCS

The Aware saga set a precedent for a secular organisation to be taken over by a group of people with common religious beliefs. Some have called it a dangerous precedent. What is the Government's view of this? What, precisely, is the danger from such an incident? Why did the Government not comment earlier?

Many Singaporeans were exercised by the leadership tussle in Aware, and have expressed their views, for and against, in our newspapers and on the Internet.

The Government has been very careful in its comments, especially before the EOGM, as it did not want to be misunderstood as taking sides. Who controls Aware is not important to the Government. As I said, Government policy on homosexuality is settled, and will not change as a result of lobbying by pressure groups.

However, the Government was worried about the disquieting public perception that a group of conservative Christians, all attending the same church, which held strong views on homosexuality, had moved in and taken over Aware because they disapproved of what Aware had been doing.

This caused many qualms among non-Christians, and also among Christians who believed that this was an unwise move in a multiracial, multi-religious society. It was much more dangerous because now religion was also getting involved, and it was no longer just the issue of homosexuality.

I was grateful therefore that Dr John Chew of the National Council of Churches of Singapore (NCCS) issued a clear statement that the NCCS does not condone churches getting involved in the Aware dispute. Leaders of different religious faiths have also come out to reinforce the NCCS message.

Their statements provided clear guidance to their followers. I felt it was important for me to endorse the NCCS statement publicly, and explain the Government's deeper concerns. Had it not been for these sober statements from religious leaders, we would have had serious problems.

Rules of engagement for religious groups and individuals

Religious leaders may find themselves caught in a bind on the Aware issue. For example, they may be against homosexuality. But they may also be against the tactics used by those who subsequently formed the new exco. Should they speak up?

Pastor Derek Hong of the Church of Our Saviour used the pulpit to urge his flock to support the new exco in Aware. What is the Government's stand on this? What causes may be urged from the pulpit, and what may not? How should religious leaders conduct themselves to ensure that harmony in Singapore is not undermined?

Religious individuals have the same rights as any citizen to express their views on issues in the public space, as guided by their teachings and personal conscience. However, like every citizen, they should always be mindful of the sensitivities of living in a multi-religious society.

All religious groups will naturally teach their followers to follow the precepts of their scriptures, to do good and to contribute to their society. The groups will naturally have views on social and moral issues. But we are not a Christian Singapore, or a Muslim Singapore, or a Buddhist or Hindu Singapore. We are a secular Singapore, in which Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus and others all have to live in peace with one another. This calls for tolerance, accommodation, and give and take on all sides.

If religious groups start to campaign to change certain government policies, or use the pulpit to mobilise their followers to pressure the Government, or push aggressively to gain ground at the expense of other groups, this must lead to trouble. Keeping religion and politics separate is a key rule of political engagement.

Political arena must be secular

Given that most people would consider religion part of civil society, can a boundary between religion and civil society be drawn? What is the Government's position on where to draw the line?

Religious groups and individuals who hold deep religious beliefs are often active in social issues, and make important contributions to the well-being of our society. Individuals who commit themselves to social or public service are often motivated by their religious convictions. And many religious groups do good work serving people in need, regardless of religious affiliations. We welcome that. They set the moral tone of our society, and are a source of strength in times of adversity.

However, our political arena must always be a secular one. Our laws and policies do not derive from religious authority, but reflect the judgments and decisions of the secular Government and Parliament to serve the national interest and collective good. These laws and public policies apply equally to all, regardless of one's race, religion or social status. This gives confidence that the system will give equal treatment and protection for all, regardless of which group one happens to belong to.

Calm down and move on

What is your comment on the Aware EOGM held on May 2, which resulted in the new exco being voted out?

I think the Aware episode showed clearly how passions and emotions naturally run high when it concerns an issue or cause salient to people's beliefs or interests. The EOGM was an emotional meeting with many heated exchanges. It was not a model of calm deliberation and patient consensus building. Both sides must now calm down and move on.

Impact on civil society

Overall, what is the Government's view of the leadership tussle at Aware? Does the Government expect to see more of such incidents?

Singaporeans are becoming more educated and informed, and we are opening up more space for people to express alternative views. I have no doubt that we will see more tussles between people holding different points of view, often anchored in their personal convictions and beliefs, on issues which they consider vitally important.

Many different communities share this tiny island. If our diversity is not to become a source of weakness, we must manage such disagreements in a responsible and balanced manner. We can articulate our views passionately without denigrating others; we can agree to disagree without being disagreeable.

The Government has to maintain order, and hold the ring impartially. It encourages the development of civic society, and gradual widening of the OB markers. But it will not stand by and watch when intemperate activism threatens our social fabric.

Observing balance and moderation, including media reporting

Some people argue that the current climate in Singapore is such that those who are against homosexuality are afraid to speak out, for fear of being branded bigots or religious fanatics, while those who advocate tolerance for homosexuality speak out freely and are deemed inclusive. Does the Government agree with such an assessment of the climate in Singapore?

I do not believe that those who are against homosexuality are afraid to speak out. However, I would caution restraint on both sides, for and against. We must not import into Singapore the culture wars between the extreme liberals and conservatives that are going on in the US.

On the whole, our religious communities have played a positive role in our society. The maturity of our religious leaders and the restraint and sense of responsibility of their followers have helped to make this a communally peaceful society. We must keep it that way by observing the rules of engagement.

This applies also to the media. The media plays an important role reporting on the issues, the groups and the personalities involved. They need to do so dispassionately and impartially. Mica had analysed the volume, tone and objectivity of the coverage of the Aware episode, and found it wanting in some respects. Some of the coverage was excessive and not sufficiently balanced.

There were indeed important issues at stake, such as the proper limits for religious activism. But the Aware episode was surely not the most important challenge facing Singapore, deserving such extensive and even breathless coverage. Whatever happened in Aware was not going to change Singapore, or the Government's social policy. Journalists should not get caught up in the stories they are reporting, however exciting the stories may be.

The Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts has given this feedback to the editors.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.361

DPM ON AWARE SAGA: Govt will step in if...

May 14, 2009
DPM ON AWARE SAGA
Govt will step in if...
Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Wong Kan Seng (left) said, 'We can articulate our views passionately without denigrating others.' --PHOTO: AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
AS SINGAPORE opens up more space for the people to express alternative views, more tussles over differing viewpoints will become common. But the government will not condone unbridled activism.

Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Wong Kan Seng said this on Thursday in response to questions from The Straits Times on the recent Association for Women in Action and Research (Aware) saga.

The Aware controversy began when it was revealed that at least four of the nine new faces leading the secular organisation were from the same church. The new guard, as they came to be known, were accused of having an anti-homosexuality agenda.

It also emerged that Aware's sexuality education programme, which was taught at some schools, appeared to promote homosexuality. This sparked off a fiery debate between pro-family and liberal groups.

Asked to comment on the danger from the Aware episode, Mr Wong said: 'Many different communities share this tiny island. If our diversity is not to become a source of weakness, we must manage such disagreements in a responsible and balanced manner.

'We can articulate our views passionately without denigrating others; we can agree to disagree without being disagreeable.

'The government has to maintain order, and hold the ring impartially. It encourages the development of civil society, and gradual widening of the OB markers.

'But it will not stand by and watch when intemperate activism threatens our social fabric.'

The saga led to a showdown on May 2 attended by over 3,000 members, and ended with the new guard being voted off in a highly-charged, seven-hour extraordinary general meeting.

'The Aware episode showed clearly how passions and emotions naturally run high when it concerns an issue or cause salient to people's beliefs or interests,' said Mr Wong.

'The EOGM was an emotional meeting with many heated exchanges. It was not a model of calm deliberation and patient consensus building.'

He called on both sides to 'calm down and move on'.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.360

DPM ON AWARE SAGA: Don't mix religion, politics

May 14, 2009
DPM ON AWARE SAGA
Don't mix religion, politics
Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng (left) warned that the Government would intervene if activism threatens Singapore's social fabric. --PHOTO: NP
THE Government has spelled out the rules of engagement for religious groups in the secular sphere, as it urged those involved in the recent Aware saga to calm down and move on.

While acknowledging that tussles are inevitable, Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng also warned that the Government would intervene if activism threatens Singapore's social fabric.

Responding to questions from The Straits Times on the recent leadership tussle at the Association for Women in Action and Research (Aware), Mr Wong on Thursday said categorically that keeping religion and politics apart was a key rule of political engagement here.

'Our political arena must always be a secular one,' he said in a detailed response to The Straits Times' queries.

'Our laws and policies do not derive from religious authority, but reflect the judgments and decisions of the secular Government and Parliament to serve the national interest and collective good.

'These laws and public policies apply equally to all, regardless of one's race, reglion or social status. This gives confidence that the system will give equal treatment and protection for all, regardless of which group one happens to belong to.

Asked to comment on Paster Derek Hong of the Church of Our Saviour using the pulpit to urge his flock to support the new Aware executive committee, which was eventually booted out after a raucous extraordinary general meeting two weeks ago, Mr Wong said: 'If religious group start to campaign to change certain government policies, or use the pulpit to mobilise their followers to pressure the government, or push aggressively to gain ground at the expense of other groups, this must lead to trouble.

'Keeping religion and politics separate is a key rule of political engagement.'

But he stressed that this did not mean the religious individuals were in any way more restricted than normal citizens.

'Religious individuals have the same rights as any citizen to express their views on issues in the public space, as guided by their teachings and personal conscience. However, like every citizen, they should always be mindful of the sensitivities of living in a multi-religious society,' said DPM Wong.

The Aware saga began on March 28, when a team of new members seized nine of the 12 positions on the exco.

What followed was weeks of accusations from both sides with the fight taking on a religious slant. Homosexuality also became a hot issue as the new guard said they had mounted a takeover because it felt Aware it was promoting lesbianism and homosexuality. Two weeks ago, the new exco was ousted at an EGM attended by over 3,000 members.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.359

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

LGBT in Singapore and the march forward

LGBT in Singapore and the march forward

SINGAPORE - Come saturday 16th May 2009, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community will come together with their supporters for a “Pink Dot” gathering at Hong Lim park. This event is historic in the sense that it will be Singapore’s first open-air and LGBT-supported event which has received the government’s go-ahead to proceed. What essentially happens is that the participants will wear pink apparels (clothes, caps, hats, glasses, etc) to the event. All of them will gather into a pink dot by 5 pm and this will be photographed from a vantage point.

This development has indicated a shift in the government’s stand. Two years ago, a gay interest group People Like Us tried to organize a pink picnic cum run at the Singapore Botanic Gardens. However, they were denied permission by the National Parks Board, with a queer reasoning:”it did not want the premier botanical institution to be used as a venue by interest groups to politicize their cause”. How a social gathering of like-minded people can be used as a platform for politicking beats even a rocket scientist.

The past few years have seen a number of watershed events of significance to the LGBT community. In a tiny step forward, Mr Goh Chok Tong revealed in an interview with the Time magazine that the government has made a move to employ openly homosexual people, even in sensitive positions. It was a quiet change until the interview. However, the spectre of religious fundamentalism has always lingered in the background. In a response to Mr Goh’s interview, a group of religious fundamentalists encouraged like-minded individuals to pursue this issue with their respective Members of the Parliaments (MP). Obviously, this is a lobby to get the government to ‘undo the change’.

Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, then chairman of the Remaking Singapore committee further justified Mr Goh’s position, noting that Singapore will do whatever it takes to attract talents, in a recognition of the contribution of gays to the economy. He acknowledged the relaxation of official sanctions against homosexuals which is backed up by a growing number of saunas, discos and bars that were tailored towards a gay clientele.

However, the government did not adopt a constant stand towards homosexuals, and one would get a feeling that the former is sending out mixed signals at that time. The banning of the aforementioned pink picnic can be seen in some ways - a setback. Thus, it appears that the red tapes are drawn. Based on the reasons given by the National Parks Board, it can be read in another way: The LGBT community is not allowed to politicize its cause.

The next movement of note was the one made to repeal Section 377A of the Penal Code, which criminalizes unnatural sex, and this includes homosexual sex. The outcome was that the government has decided to retain 377A, but it will not be actively enforced, which means that homosexuals could lead their private lives without harrassment. 377A was retained in consideration for the conservative elements within our society. At best, its retention was for ceremonial purposes. Thus, the government was in some sort of a catch 22 situation. Repeal the 377A and the conservative elements will start crying foul. The government wants to placate the conservative elements, and yet it also wants to adopt an inclusive approach towards the homosexuals. This was perhaps the reason why the government has adopted this unique approach of retaining 377A without enforcement.

Meanwhile, the spectre of religious fundamentalism looming in the background suddenly emerged into the foreground. A group of ladies from the Church of Our Saviour (COOS), an institution with homophobic leanings, took over the leadership of AWARE, a women’s advocacy group. They were “apprentices” of their feminist mentor, Dr Thio Su Mien. Dr Thio revealed in a press conference that she was ‘perturbed’ by the neutral portrayal of homosexuality by AWARE’s comprehensive sexuality program. She has always felt that homosexuality should be cast in a negative light. No one would find this surprising, given the fact that she is also a COOS member like her apprentices. And she was explicit in her motivation to radically change AWARE, albeit through her apprentices. The old guards of AWARE were caught unware by the takeover of leadership, and this culminated in an extraordinary general meeting (EOGM) showdown. In some ways, this showdown was a battle between inclusiveness/ tolerance and exclusiveness.

The EOGM was in some ways a thriumph for the inclusiveness/tolerance camp. And the public repudiation of Dr Thio at the EOGM made the victory even sweeter. The “Pink Dot” gathering has arrived in good time during the wake of this thriumph. Hopefully, the thriumphant march of tolerance and inclusiveness will continue come Saturday.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28024.336

Mas Selamat Used Buoy Lights As Guide As He Swam Across Strait

Mas Selamat Used Buoy Lights As Guide As He Swam Across Strait

May 13, 2009

By Mohd Haikal Isa

JOHOR BAHARU, May 12 (Bernama) — Not much is known how Mas Selamat Kastari, the Singapore Jemaah Islamiyah leader, evaded arrest in the republic after he slipped out of a maximum security prison on the island in February last year.

Bernama was told however that the Singapore’s most-wanted militant had holed up in several places on the island, all the time eluding the massive manhunt going on around him.

On the night of the fourth day after he slipped out of Whitley Road detention centre, he reached Woodlands in the northern coast of Singapore and swam across the Tebrau Strait towards Stulang Laut in Johor Baharu under the cover of darkness.

“He used the buoy lights, which mark the border at the Tebrau Strait, as his guide to reach the place where he thought he could find a refuge,” a source who is familiar with the operation to nab the fugitive told Bernama today.

Mas Selamat’s ability to evade arrest despite the massive manhunt, with thousands of security personnel combing the island and coastal areas, was still a mystery until today, the source said.

Mas Selamat, who has a limp on his left leg and said to be an expert in using firearms and in making explosives, was the alleged mastermind of a plot to hijack a jetliner in Bangkok and crash it to Singapore’s Changi Airport.

His disappearance from the prison embarrassed Singapore, a country known for its modern security forces.

Apart from launching an islandwide manhunt, Singapore had also tightened security in all entry points but found no trace of Mas Selamat even as days, weeks and months went by.

The manhunt finally ended early last month with the fugitive’s capture by Malaysian police in Skudai, more than a year after his escape in broad daylight.

The source said that despite every possibility of bumping into security forces deployed to nab him, Mas Selamat managed to reach Woodlands — a journey that would have taken him across densely populated areas.

“It is still a puzzle how he managed to avoid arrest and travel up to Woodlands, which is not a short distance from Whitley Road.

“Perhaps we will be able to know later whether he had walked to Woodlands or used public transport, and the route he had taken to reach Woodlands,” he said.

The security in Woodlands is no less tight because it is the main checkpoints for the hundreds of thousands commuters going to and coming from the Johor Causeway.

He said the Singapore authorities had also tightened security in Tebrau Strait in anticipation of Mas Selamat making a dash across the narrow waterway.

The Singapore coast guard, he said, stationed boats in every one kilometre along the sea border, a proof of how tight the security had been.

But no amount of tight security managed to stop the elusive Mas Selamat from fleeing the island.

In reaching Stulang Laut, Mas Selamat would have swam in between the patrolling boats.

As reported by Bernama previously, upon reaching Stulang Laut, Mas Selamat met his trusted friends Abdul Matin in Ulu Tiram and Johar Hassan who lived in a village in Skudai, Johor Baharu.

The source also refuted reports that the capture of Mas Selamat in Johor was the result of a joint operation between the Malaysian police and the neighbouring country’s police.

“Although we did exchange intelligence, the operation to trace and capture Mas Selamat was carried out fully by the Malaysian police.

“Foreign agency cannot carry out any intelligence operation in the country,” he said.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28568.165

Mas Selemat Caught: Difficult for strangers to find rustic village

Mas Selemat Caught
THE COVER KAMPUNG CAMOUFLAGE
Difficult for strangers to find rustic village
By Chong Shin Yen
May 13, 2009 Print Ready Email Article

Click to see larger image
QUIET: The rustic kampung where Mas Selamat hid in is one of many found off the main road of Jalan Kampung Maju Jaya. (Below) A punching bag and a pile of clothes inside his quarters. TNP PICTURES: JONATHAN CHOO

BLINK and you'll miss it.

The rustic kampung where Mas Selamat Kastari hid while on the run is one of many found off the main road of Jalan Kampung Maju Jaya.

A rickety wooden signboard, weathered with age, is the only hint of its existence.

Painted in yellow against a blue background were the words Kampung Tawakal.

In Arabic, they mean 'surrender yourself' - not exactly the best choice for a hideout if Mas Selamat is the superstitious sort.

Click to see larger image

It took The New Paper almost three hours to find it, though the place is merely a 40-minute drive from the Causeway.

The kampung in Kempas, Johor Baru, is unmarked on any map, not even on Google Earth.

For strangers, it's almost impossible to find the only road that leads into the village.

Surrounding the kampung are factories and plantations.

The only significant landmark to that area is the exclusive Starhill Golf and Country Club, about 5km from the kampung.

The one-lane road leading to the kampung is barely wide enough for two cars to pass.

Click to see larger image

Travel down about 100m and the first house comes into sight.

The houses, with sprawling gardens, are well-kept. Some had two or three cars parked on the porch.

The kampung was quiet before the Singapore media descended on the village. There was not a villager in sight when we first drove down the straight paved road.

Villager Wasilan Suaudi, 53, who has lived at the kampung for more than 20 years, said that there are about 40 houses there.

The tiny kampung has a population of fewer than 100.

'Many of the villagers here are in their 50s and are retirees or about to retire,' Mr Wasilan said.

'The biggest family here has only five people. The younger generation had mostly moved out of the village, leaving the old ones behind.'

Mr Wasilan, a shop owner, lives with his 25-year-old daughter and his aged father.

His 17-year-old son lives in a neighbouring village.

There are no cinemas or shopping malls in the village to while away your weekends. The nearest shopping area is about 8km away.

The villagers spend their time watching TV shows or going to the small eatery just outside the village, at the main road.

From the outside, No. 15 - the house Mas Selamat stayed at - had only one distinct feature that made it stand out from the other houses.

It was on stilts, one of only two such houses in the village.

So secluded is the kampung that even the police made a mistake when they arrived on 1 Apr to arrest Mas Selamat.

Said another neighbour, Mr Jamian Simin, 70: 'The police broke the wrong door when they arrived at about 6am that day.

'They had gone to No. 10 (the only other house on stilts). They broke down the door leading to the basement of the house and found that the place was unoccupied.'

Mr Jamian was woken from his sleep that morning from the sound of people kicking at the door of a nearby house.

Peering out of the living room window, he saw police officers - some in uniform and others in plain-clothes - running past his house.

Then, he saw them kicking down the door as 30 armed police officers surrounded house No. 15.

The police were shouting 'Buka pintu, buka pintu. Jengan Lari. (Malay for 'open the door, don't run.')'

Bundled in police car

Not long after, Mr Jamian saw them leading someone out from the basement of the house.

'A man, clad in T-shirt and shorts, with his face covered in a dark blue checked sarong, was led out.

'He was quickly bundled into a police car and taken away.'

The drama was over within 30 minutes. The man taken away that morning was Mas Selamat.

Mr Jamian added: 'It's not easy to find someone here as some of the houses are not marked.'

Yesterday, the media - both from Malaysia and Singapore - descended on the small kampung in search of the house where Mas Selamat had been staying.

The neighbours who were at home were mostly friendly.

Mr Jamian even held an impromptu press conference in his living room, talking to at least 10 reporters and photojournalists.

'Please come in,' was what Mr Jamian said to every reporter who came to his door, which was wide open.

Close-knit community

Villagers The New Paper spoke to said they were a close-knit community, and that everyone knew one another.

Even Mas Selamat, who seldom talked to his neighbours, would sometimes hand them gifts.

Mr Wasilan said: 'He would often take fruits, like rambutans and mangosteens, from trees which he planted, to my house and give it to my family.

But villagers noted that it was hard to keep track of people living in their kampung as many of the houses were unoccupied and rented out to tenants who did not stay long.

Most of the Tawakal villagers The New Paper spoke to were shocked that the fugitive, described as dangerous by the authorities, had been living in their midst.

'We are friendly to everyone in the kampung,' said Mr Jamian, adding that it's inevitable for villagers to feel scared even after Mas Selamat has been nabbed.

He said: 'I can't imagine what he'd been up to inside the house.'

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28568.163

PM Lee, Najib to discuss Mas Selamat arrest next week

PM Lee, Najib to discuss Mas Selamat arrest next week
By Channel NewsAsia's Malaysia Bureau Chief Melissa Goh | Posted: 13 May 2009 2138 hrs

Photos 1 of 1 > " onclick="Next();" src="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/images/butt_next.gif" type="image" width="18" height="15">

Photo taken of Mas Selamat Kastari after his arrest on April 1.
Special Report
Mas Selamat Arrest

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak is expected to discuss the arrest of terror suspect Mas Selamat Kastari when he meets Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong next week.

Mr Najib, who was sworn in early last month, is scheduled to be in Singapore for an introductory visit from May 21-22.

Speaking at his office in Putrajaya, Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein declined to say if Malaysia will hand over the terror suspect to Singapore.

The 48-year-old terrorist escaped from Singapore's detention centre last year.

Mr Hishammuddin reiterated that the arrest of Mas Selamat - who escaped detention three times - would not have been possible without the cooperation of intelligence services from Singapore and Indonesia.

He said the Malaysian Cabinet has also approved the setting up of an Aseanapol permanent secretariat. To be based in Kuala Lumpur, the office will allow the intelligence agencies of ASEAN members to cooperate and share resources to better fight crime as well as terrorism.

Mr Hishammuddin said: "For instance, one recent issue relating to Mas Selamat - it involves three countries. If there was no cooperation between the three, it will not lead to the arrest of the person concerned."

- CNA/ir

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28568.168

Online petition calls for STTA president's removal over coach saga

Online petition calls for STTA president's removal over coach saga
By Patwant Singh, Channel NewsAsia/Geraldine Soh, 938LIVE | Posted: 13 May 2009 2314 hrs



Photos 1 of 1



Lee Bee Wah




Video
Online petition asks for STTA president's removal over coach saga

SINGAPORE: An online petition has surfaced, calling for the removal of Lee Bee Wah as president of the Singapore Table Tennis Association (STTA).

This comes amid public debate over the association's latest decision not to nominate former table tennis coach Liu Guodong for the Coach of the Year award.

Liu had led the Singapore women's team to win a silver medal at last year's Beijing Games, ending the republic's 48-year Olympic medal drought.

Ms Lee said Liu's integrity and professionalism was in question and this led to the decision not to nominate him for the award. The decision did not go down well with Liu, who is currently in China, and the public.

Some netizens have started a petition asking for the removal of Ms Lee as STTA president.

When contacted, the association's honorary secretary Soon Min Sin said it is standing firm, both in its decision not to nominate Liu for the award as well as support of Ms Lee as president.

One key factor, though not the only one, that led to Ms Lee being elected as president last July was her passion for the sport, said Mr Soon.

So it did not matter that she was not actively involved in the association before being elected or that veterans like Mr Soon, who has been there for 16 years, did not know her very well.

She showed that she cared, and had some understanding of the sport as an ex-captain of the Nanyang Technological University team - that was what won over the majority of the "30 to 40" representatives at the Annual General Meeting that day, according to Mr Soon.

And nine months later, she has the results to show for it.

"I think she has gelled the national team together. The players, the coaches are now a lot more cohesive than before. Even when players fall sick, she goes to the hospital to visit them. These are all behind the scenes."

Mr Soon added that since the start of this year, Ms Lee has also been pushing for kindergarten kids to take up the sport and the association is now in discussion with 20 PCF kindergartens to do so.

To be sure, Mr Soon said the association did not get to where it is today based on Ms Lee's efforts alone, but she has certainly played a part.

As for the decision not to nominate former coach Liu for the award, Mr Soon said it is not just about the results although winning the Olympic silver medal is highly commendable.

He said: "(If) you don't nominate someone to be the best teacher, (it) doesn't mean he's a lousy teacher. Why is it that people can't accept this? To be the best coach of Singapore, I think, we also want to look at various criteria.

"If we're to mention all the areas and examples, it can be perceived as a personal attack. The reason that SNOC (Singapore National Olympic Council) left it to the association to nominate must be that the association knows its people, not everything the public will know.

"If the public wants to start a petition, they've every right to do so. But what's important is to ask ourselves 'what is the role of STTA and are we doing our job?'"

Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Community Development, Youth and Sports Teo Ser Luck feels that choices have been made and they should be respected.

"They must have their reasons and we'll just have to abide by what they've decided. There're different views now, so personally I'll just have to see what happens," he said.

Liu said he is not too concerned about the award. But he is not happy with the accusations levelled against him.

He said: "The least you can do is to not attack me through the press, or to comment that I have moral issues. If it was said on a personal level, I would have dismissed it. But the comments were published in the papers, so you can imagine the harm done to me.

"You, as part of the higher management, cannot irresponsibly comment about someone. I do not know you, neither do you know me. You cannot base your comments on hearsay.

"I've already left the association for half a year. If such problems arise, it shows that the table tennis association is still picking on me. Actually, I was forced to leave Singapore, so I feel I should be allowed to participate in the competition."

Liu is returning to Singapore early Thursday morning. He told the media that he plans to meet Ms Lee and get her to clarify the comments she made about him.

The recent controversy involving Liu is not new. Before this, he had been accused of neglecting one of the male players during the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

- CNA/938LIVE/ir

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28839.7

H1N1 FLU OUTBREAK: S'pore ready for flu patients

May 13, 2009
H1N1 FLU OUTBREAK
S'pore ready for flu patients
No one has H1N1 flu yet, but Khaw unveils action plans, keeps yellow alert
By Bertha Henson, Associate Editor
Mr Khaw said the alert level will stay yellow even if the World Health Organisation declares a full-blown pandemic. -- ST PHOTO: STEPHANIE YEOW
SINGAPORE has been lucky not to have a single person here ill with the H1N1 flu so far, but it is prepared for that eventuality.

If it happens, the measures taken will include quarantine for those in close contact with the patient, as was done during the 2003 Sars crisis. But there is no need for more drastic steps taken then, such as closing the patient's workplace.

This is because the H1N1 virus, while contagious, has so far been mild, with patients who are treated early recovering quickly.

A place would be shut down only if the patient had been cloistered with many others, raising the chances of more falling ill. Such places would include childcare centres and foreign worker dormitories.

Describing what will be done if a student, worker or traveller is diagnosed with the bug, Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan said yesterday: 'We must know how to react to the first few cases. We need Singaporeans to understand our rationale so that there is no misunderstanding or panic when cases do emerge.'

He also cautioned against being fixated on the number of confirmed cases or where else the virus has spread to.

'The public health focus should be on the severity, if any, of the new cases: Do the patients develop complications, pneumonia, severe respiratory failure? Who are those vulnerable to developing complications so that we can focus on treating them early?'

The virus first appeared in Mexico last month and has spread to at least 30 countries, landing in China on Monday and in Thailand yesterday. Most cases have been mild. The United States has eclipsed Mexico as the country with the most cases, but only three people have died there.

The low fatality rate in the US is the reason why there is no move yet to quarantine those arriving from North America, said Mr Khaw.

Likewise, given the mild nature of the virus infecting those who had travelled to Mexico, the Health Ministry is also reviewing the current policy of quarantining those who had been there recently.


http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.130

H1N1 flu watch

May 13, 2009
H1N1 flu outbreak
H1N1 flu watch

PHOTO: AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

ALERT LEVELS

WHO ALERT PHASE: 5
Widespread human infection

MOH ALERT SYSTEM: YELLOW

Risk of import into Singapore elevated. Isolated imported cases may occur but there is no sustained transmission.

SUSPECTED AND CONFIRMED CASES

Deaths: Global total of 63

58 in Mexico; three in US; one in Canada and one in Costa Rica. Officials said the Canadian, U.S. and Costa Rican victims also had other medical conditions.

Confirmed cases: Estimated 5,914 in 33 countries, including at least 2,282 in Mexico, 3,009 in 45 US states, and 358 in Canada.

KEY DEVELOPMENTS

Swiss pharmaceuticals company Roche Holding AG says it's donating enough Tamiflu to WHO to treat 5.65 million people. Tamiflu is one of two anti-viral drugs effective against swine flu.

China says it has tracked down and quarantined most passengers who were on flights with the mainland's first confirmed case. The man is a Chinese graduate student at the University of Missouri and became ill while returning to China.

A study published in the journal Science estimates Mexico may actually have had 6,000 to 32,000 cases. It also estimated Mexico may have had 23,000 cases by April 23, the day it announced the epidemic. The study estimates that between 0.4 per cent and 1.4 per cent of swine flu cases are fatal.

WHO says up to 2 billion people could be infected if outbreak eventually turns into pandemic. But WHO flu chief Keiji Fukuda says it's too early to tell how widespread or severe the outbreak will become.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.129


SEXUALITY EDUCATION: Instilling values a complex task

May 13, 2009
SEXUALITY EDUCATION
Instilling values a complex task

I READ with concern last Saturday's letter supporting the suspension of all sexuality education programmes offered by external agencies ('Schools should stop offering them altogether').

Some of the questionable assumptions underlying the writer's criticisms of the external programmes include:

# Schools and parents are the primary sources of information on gender and sexuality for young people.

# Focusing on mainstream views and values of Singapore society will help students learn them and adopt them without question.

# Making students aware of alternative views and lifestyles is as good as promoting them.

# All parents and teachers are sufficiently willing and able to teach their children the best values concerning gender and sexuality.

These assumptions underestimate the complexity of values education in our contemporary society.

The social and cultural environment in which young people are informally educated consists of more than parents and teachers. In today's information society, a child's identity develops under influences that far exceed the censorship of well-meaning adults.

Television, cinema, popular music and the Internet, for example, are powerful and pervasive transmitters of popular culture and cosmopolitan values.

Such media images of gender roles and sexual behaviour draw on a range of liberal and conservative perspectives.

To what extent does the formal curriculum in schools teach students to critically analyse these diverse media messages so as to help them make responsible, well- informed decisions for themselves?

Censoring all alternative views would be contrary to the Ministry of Education's (MOE) push for critical thinking. If argumentative essays at the secondary and junior college levels can encourage students to engage both sides of the 'pro-life' and 'pro-choice' abortion debate, why should not this balanced approach be similarly extended to the controversial topics of gender roles and sexual orientation?

A mature curriculum for sexuality education should reflect not only the mainstream views and values of Singapore's society but also an educated awareness of alternative views based on well- researched knowledge and information.

Perhaps, MOE would be wise to consult students for their views on what ought to be included in a 21st century sexuality education curriculum. Our children are often more precocious than we give them credit for. Silencing their views in favour of the dominant conservatism is itself a kind of prejudice against the ability of young people to think for themselves.

Warren Mark Liew

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.128

Lee Wei Ling: Let it in while benign to develop herd immunity

May 13, 2009
DEALING WITH H1N1 VIRUS
Let it in while benign to develop herd immunity

THE Influenza A (H1N1) virus is rapidly sweeping over the United States, Europe and Asia. It will be impossible to prevent the virus from entering Singapore just by screening those entering here who are ill and/or febrile.

We know that of all the patients who carry H1N1, at least 30 per cent are asymptomatic, and even those who will become symptomatic are infectious for at least the first 24 hours before symptoms appear. However, we are still doing temperature screenings at our borders and other public sites and buildings. A false negative is highly likely and is worse than not screening at all as infectious individuals may then go around thinking that they are well.

World Health Organisation director- general Margaret Chan warns that the virus may well return in a more virulent form after lying dormant in the warm months of the northern hemisphere. Singapore needs to rethink its strategy in this respect while we still have time.

We should stop temperature screening, which is ineffective for picking up infected subjects. When the pandemic started, there was a concern that it could be a virulent disease which makes sense for countries to err on the side of over-cautiousness and adopt stringent measures to prevent its spread. The situation has since changed as we learn more about the H1N1 virus. �It appears to be highly contagious, but with low morbidity and mortality. �

One possibility suggested by some doctors, including specialists in infectious diseases, is to freely open our borders, allow the relatively benign H1N1 to come into Singapore and allow our people to develop herd immunity. This way, if or when the virus mutates and turns virulent, our herd immunity may better protect us from a serious epidemic. In my view, there is merit in this idea. Continuing with the present strategy may invite more risks.

Professor Lee Wei Ling

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28080.128

New Petition to Remove Lee Bee Wah as President of STTA started by National Healthcare Group’s Employee

Remove Lee Bee Wah as STTA President

View Current Signatures - Sign the Petition


To: Singaporeans

Background:

Ever since Lee Bee Wah took over as president of STTA, the organization has been mired in controversy and disrepute.

A few weeks into her stint, she caused a stir in Beijing with her outburst against coach Liu Guodong which spoilt the nation’s celebratory mood at winning Singapore’s first Olympic silver medal in 48 years.

Now after Liu has left the team, she is vindictive enough to settle personal scores with him by casting aspersions on his integrity in public and refusing to nominate him as a candidate for the Coach of the Year Award.

Lee Bee Wah has no knowledge and experience in sports administration. She has demonstrated by her actions so far that she is unfit to lead a national sports organization like STTA.


Petition:

We, the undersigned call on Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, Minister for Community, Youth and Sports to remove Lee Bee Wah as President of STTA immediately to placate widespread fury over her mismanagement and for the sake of table tennis’ future in Singapore. we are concerned that under her leadership, we will never be able to win another medal again.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

http://www.petitiononline.com/lbh/petition.html

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28839.4

Petition to Remove Lee Bee Wah as President of STTA started by National Healthcare Group's Employee

Remove Lee Bee Wah as President of STTA
80 Signatures
Published by Eugene on May 11, 2009
Closed on May 12, 2009
Category: Local Government
Region: Singapore
Target: Singaporeans
Result:
This petition is now closed.
Background (Preamble):
Ever since Lee Bee Wah took over as president of STTA, the organization has been mired in controversy and disrepute.

A few weeks into her stint, she caused a stir in Beijing with her outburst against coach Liu Guodong which spoilt the nation's celebratory mood at winning Singapore's first Olympic silver medal in 48 years.

Now after Liu has left the team, she is vindictive enough to settle personal scores with him by casting aspersions on his integrity in public and refusing to nominate him as a candidate for the Coach of the Year Award.

Lee Bee Wah has no knowledge and experience in sports administration. She has demonstrated by her actions so far that she is unfit to lead a national sports organization like STTA.
Petition:
We, the undersigned call on Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, Minister for Community, Youth and Sports to remove Lee Bee Wah as President of STTA immediately to placate widespread public fury over her mismanagement and for the sake of table tennis' future in Singapore. We are concerned that under her leadership, we will never be able to win another medal again.

http://www.gopetition.com/online/27689.html

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sunkopitiam/messages?msg=28839.1